While Minnesota's early childhood (EC) system has many assets, the existing high degree of fragmentation creates resource accessibility problems for both families and providers. Recently, there has been a growing call for a unified voice to facilitate change in Minnesota's early childhood system. This presents an opportunity for an organization like Resources for Child Caring (RCC), a well‐established regional organization, to assume a prominent role in efforts to reform the EC system by becoming an intermediary organization. Becoming an intermediary would provide RCC an opportunity to grow and become a leader in efforts to improve services and outcomes for Minnesota's children.Before taking this path, RCC will need to carefully consider the benefits and consequences of such a change and whether such a move would fit the mission and vision of the organization. To help RCC assess its capacity for growth and to fulfill an intermediary role, we conducted an in‐depth study of the organization's current state, as well as research on the Minnesota early childhood field and existing models of intermediary organizations. This report presents our literature review, organizational audit of current conditions, and organizational gap analysis.
Resources for Child Caring lacks a consensus on mission, vision, and purpose, and does not have a strategic plan to direct future growth. Its structure impedes communication and innovation, and staff do not receive support from management. RCC is also not well-known in the community, hindered by a lack of expertise in public relations and branding,
Resources of Child Caring is uniquely poised to play an intermediary role in Minnesota's early childhood education system because of its longevity, breadth and depth of services, financial stability, and talented staff and leadership.
Of the four intermediary functions (Connecting, Convening, Measuring, and Sustaining), RCC may be best suited to perform a Connecting role, as it is most similar to its current activities.
Although becoming an intermediary would present a great opportunity for RCC, it is equally clear that it poses significant risk for the organization. The threat is that RCC will not be able to fill this role well, and will invest significant resources that do not lead to improved outcomes for children.
This web page is marked up with Schema.org microdata. Much of the necessary microdata is embedded within the HTML that creates the display you see above. The data that shows below is formatted for machine-reading and rounds out the complete descriptive set for this resource. Want more info about all of this? Go here. You can also view the complete dataset for this resource the way a machine sees it here .
Title: Resources for Child Caring: An Early Childhood Intermediary?
Publication date 2010-05-10
Publication Year 2010
University of Minnesota
, child caring
, Literature/Research Review
Resource provided by IssueLab
IssueLab's Embeddable Widget
Use this super simple form to customize and generate the code you need to display this content in your own environment - no programming required. The feed will inherit more specific styles, like font face and font color, from your website.
Your widget code
Add to the Collection
Please use the form below to provide us with your recommendation, and we'll check it out. Include your name and email address along with your suggestion just in case we need to get in touch. Thank you for contacting us.